Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

Wife-beating is normally practiced in the modern universe, but it is in Muslim society that wife-beating is particularly ferocious, as Islamic faith allows hubbies to crush their married womans, harmonizing to the poetry 34 of the Qur’an and the commissariats of the Hadith. Actually, this issue evokes controversial sentiments of the populace that either supports married woman whipping or strongly criticises it. But whatever is the public attitude, wife-beating explicitly uncovers the low-level place of adult females in Muslim society and the inhuman treatment of domestic force that transforms a adult female into a mere object. It is this low-level position of females that explains the dictate of work forces over adult females in matrimony dealingss. Therefore, the purpose of this essay is to look into in deepness the issue of wife-beating in Islam, paying attending to spiritual, societal and legal dictates in modern-day Muslim society, because, harmonizing to Copelon ( 1994 ) , “wife-beating is… non an person, isolated, or deviant act, but a societal licence, a responsibility or mark of maleness, profoundly ingrained in civilization, widely practiced, denied and wholly or mostly immune from legal sanction” ( p.116 ) . Experiencing economic dependance from work forces and being unable to get the better of Islamic spiritual and legal commissariats, Muslim adult females become victims of the bing societal system.

Islam faith points at the fact that males excel females ; therefore, when a Muslim adult male marries a adult female, he acquires the right for her. Although Muhammad insisted on sort dealingss between a married woman and a hubby, he at the same time maintained the impression that in the instances of noncompliance a married woman should be beaten. As is stated in the Qur’an, “Men have authorization over adult females because God has made the one higher-up to the other… As for those from whom you fear noncompliance, warn them and direct them to beds apart and crush them” ( Dawood, 1995 4:34 ) . Although the Qur’an insists on little force in rare instances, the really mentioning of wife-beating destroys all efforts to invalidate domestic force in Muslim society. Mernissi ( 1991 ) provides a more elaborate account: “if we continue the reading of this poetry, we realise that it sanctifies the right of work forces to strike their married womans on instance of ‘nushuz’ – that is, rebellion against male authority” ( p.155 ) . The Hadith besides gives many illustrations of married woman whipping in Muslim society, bring outing complex dealingss between work forces and adult females. All illustrations described in the Hadith demonstrate that Islam justifies wife-beating in the instances of female noncompliance. For case, in the narrative of Ikrima Muhammad does non reprobate a hubby in wife-beating ; alternatively he blames a adult female for her noncompliance ( Bukhari, 1987 7:715 ) . As a Muslim adult female is deprived of equality with a adult male, she has to obey her hubby and digest the painful procedure of crushing without any show of hostility from her side. Such domestic force reflects the societal and spiritual dictates that have existed in Muslim society since early times. Other illustrations from the Hadith supply more grounds that Muslim work forces are allowed to use force against their married womans. For illustration, in Sahih Muslim there is a mentioning of Abu Jahm who “is a great beater of women” ( Muslim, 1971 9:3526 ) .

But, as is narrated by Aisha, Muhammad’s married woman, it is non merely her hubby who beats her, but her male parent Abu Bakr strikes her every bit good: “Abu Bakr came towards me and struck me violently with his fist” ( Bukhari, 1987 8:828 ) . Before his decease Muhammad claims to Muslim work forces: “You have rights over your wives… for they are your wards holding no control of their passions” ( Guillaume 1955 p.651 ) . Analyzing these words, it is clear that due to the fact that females are non able to command their passions, Muslim work forces have a full control over them ( Kathir, 2000 ) . If a hubby realises that wife’s attitude to him is disobedient, he has the right to crush her. As Al-Qaradawi ( 1984 ) puts it, “One may crush merely to safeguard Islamic behavior and if he ( the hubby ) sees divergence merely in what she must make or obey in relation to him” ( p.206 ) . However, as the degree of noncompliance is established on the single footing, the Qur’an is non able to specify this degree. In this respect, a adult male may be incorrect in his rating of female noncompliance, but he is non reproached for his erroneous judgements. Harmonizing to Islam, a Muslim adult female should handle her hubby as ‘god’ , fulfilling him in all his desires, and if she fails to make so, she should be punished. As a consequence of such inferior place, a Muslim adult female is injured both physically and psychologically, and this job is even more terrible today than it was in early Islamic history.

Despite the spread of feminism that well improves the place of adult females all over the universe, Muslim society continues to put adult females in low places. Muslim clergy defends the right of a adult male to crush a adult female, claiming that if this right is prohibited, so the whole Islamic faith is violated. Muslim elites maintain the similar point of view, using the Hadith and the Qur’an to support their place. Muslim work forces are brought up with the impression of wife-beating ; they observe female inferior places in their ain households, reassigning such attitude to their dealingss with adult females. As Sasson ( 1992 ) explains in respect to Islamic society in Saudi Arabia, “From an early age, the male kid is taught that adult females are of small value: they exist merely for his comfort and convenience” ( p.22 ) . Furthermore, Muslim adult females are besides used to such intervention, normally sing that physical maltreatment is Allah’s will ; although some adult females make efforts to dispute such inferior places, using to Imams for the consolation, they eventually realise that this resistance aggravates their dealingss with work forces. Imams insist on women’s obeisance, even in the instance of physical maltreatment, or wholly disregard their ailments, indicating at the fact that household jobs should non be exposed to public treatment. Therefore, a Muslim adult female is lacerate between her belief in Allah that justifies wife-beating and her fright of maltreatment. As Mackay ( 1990 ) acknowledges, “The man’s absolute authorization over the adult females in his household is maintained through fright – the fright of physical ferociousness, the fright of economic insecurity” ( p.138 ) . Although theoretically a Muslim adult female may have a divorce, it seldom occurs in pattern, because a adult female realises that in the instance of divorce, she will be regarded as a black female and will be forced to populate in poorness.

Harmonizing to Islam, a adult female has no right for belongings and fundss, irrespective of her matrimonial position. As a Muslim adult female is chiefly treated in footings of a married woman and a female parent, she fails to get employment, if she decides to work, although she sometimes may engage out as an pedagogue or a nurse. Despite the fact that Islam does non oppose female employment, Muslim adult females seldom get an appropriate occupation. Besides, the divorce in Muslim society may be delayed for old ages, and throughout this period a female will be beaten by her hubby for noncompliance. In position of such world, a adult female is about reduced to a place of a slave who has nor rights and independency ( Hatimy, 1991 ) , despite the fact that the Qur’an warns Muslim work forces against handling females as slaves ( Asad, 1980 ) . But it seems than work forces in Islamic society put a different accent on the Qur’an’s tenet, using them for their ain convenience and destructing female individualism. In the beginning of 2000 a great figure of demonstrators appeared in the streets of Rabat ( Morocco ) to back up the jurisprudence that was aimed at supplying Muslim adult females with the right to disassociate ; nevertheless, the same figure of demonstrators opposed this jurisprudence, looking in the streets of Casablanca and claiming that this jurisprudence is against the Islamic commissariats. The fact is that merely a Muslim adult male has the right to disassociate a adult female, while a female is deprived of such a right ( Afkhami & A ; Vazeri, 1996 ) . Those who oppose the jurisprudence point out that it destroys the really footing of Islamic faith and society, as it gives legal rights to adult females who have frequently been regarded as inferior to work forces. If a Muslim adult female is allowed to disassociate, domestic force will be eliminated ; nevertheless, as the traditions are instead strong in Islam, this legalization of divorce is non accepted by the bulk of Muslim males.

Although in European states domestic force is considered as a offense, Muslim society makes everything to warrant wife-beating. In fact, domestic force particularly survives in those topographic points, where it is lawfully or sacredly maintained ( Bumiller, 1988 ) , as is merely the instance with assorted Muslim societies, where governments control both gender functions and faith. As the Muslim legal system is closely connected with the bing societal political orientations and spiritual beliefs that are based on Islamic spiritual texts, there is no topographic point for reforms in this society, particularly in respect to females. Get downing from 1970s, assorted Islamist motions in Asia, the Middle East and Africa have tried to resuscitate Islamic tenet through the formation of the authorities system that conforms to the rules of shari’a ( spiritual Torahs ) ( Halliday & A ; Alavi, 1988 ; Stork & A ; Beinin, 1997 ) . In Muslims’ vision, the devotedness to the Torahs of shari’a reflects their fidelity fond regard to Islamic tenet ( Mayer, 1991 ) , but such dogmatism reveals their narrow-mindedness and their reluctance to alter the place of work forces and adult females, as in this instance it will be necessary to alter spiritual tenet, bing Torahs and societal commissariats. Actually, shari’a provides adult females with some rights, but, in general, it demonstrates female inequality with work forces, particularly refering matrimony picks, legal competency and divorce.

Indicating at the fact that the domestic kingdom well influences the societal kingdom, Muslim society allows domestic force. As a adult male is a maestro of a household, he takes control over his married woman and kids, while a female is reduced to the low-level place. The Qur’an reveals that even if a adult female does non hold with her hubby on certain issues, she has to obey her husband’s wants and determinations. The similar impression is maintained in the Islamic legal system that places Muslim work forces above their adult females. As a consequence, a Muslim adult female has no right to take a non-Muslim hubby, if she disobeys this regulation, she may be beaten by her male parent, and the tribunal will surely justifies a adult male. Nowadays assorted Muslim societies wrongly interpret Islamic tenet, seeking to legalize domestic force and escalate male power. In this respect, Muslim clergy and legal governments apply to female favoritism and utilise certain commissariats of the Qur’an that are no longer valid in the modern universe. As Moslems are afraid of the spread of female independency in modern-day society, they make changeless efforts to extinguish any show of equality between work forces and adult females. In position of this fright, Muslim work forces utilise domestic force to stamp down women’s will and insulate them from the populace.

Therefore, domestic force in Muslim society clearly points at the inequality between two genders ; although in the bulk of European states domestic force is considered as a complex societal job ( Dobash & A ; Dobash, 1980 ) , the Muslims do non hold with such definition, because, harmonizing to Islam, work forces and adult females are non created equal by Allah. And if the job is non recognised, it can non be solved ; nevertheless, it is obvious that if spiritual and legal Torahs of the Muslims accept equality between males and females, it will be possible to extinguish domestic force. But the really footing of Islam stems from the thought of gender inequality, and the legitimacy of wife-beating aggravates this inequality, warranting force against females, but non against males. No uncertainty, a Muslim adult female can non use any signifier of force against a Muslim adult male, even if she is sexually abused by her male parent or other relations. If a Muslim adult female decides to derive a divorce on the footing of husband’s force, the physical grounds of this force should be so great that the justice will accept it as the chief ground for divorce. Besides, harmonizing to the shari’a commissariats, the act of force should be proved by at least two informants ; nevertheless, as wife-beating mainly occurs in privateness, it is really hard to happen these informants. The same regards the sexual colza in matrimony ; despite the fact that the Qur’an warns against sexual maltreatment in matrimony dealingss, a Muslim adult female who refuses to do sex with her hubby, may be sexually abused by him. Such force will be surely justified in spiritual and legal footings, because a adult female reveals noncompliance to her hubby ( El Alami & A ; Hinchcliffe, 1996 ) . As a consequence, Islamic females seldom decide to divorces ; that is why the instances of domestic force are normally concealed from the national and international populace.

Although some recent international criterions oppose domestic force in respect to females, assorted Muslim societies point at the fact that these criterions violate the commissariats of shari’a that are thought to be godly and, therefore, can non be changed. Despite the fact that Muslim governments modify some Islamic constructs, this is non the instance with the female position and domestic force in Islamic society. Rejecting international criterions of human rights, these governments intensify their attachment to shari’a. In the old ages of 1960-1980s certain international ordinances, like CEDAW and the Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, were designed to better the conditions of adult females all over the universe. Though many Muslim societies signed these ordinances, certain reserves were made ( Jimmy conorss, 1997 ) . In peculiar, about all states insisted on the saving of those commissariats of shari’a that trade with single female issues. For case, Muslim societies of Libya, Bangladesh, Morocco, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt opposed Articles 16 and 17 of CEDAW that established the equality between work forces and adult females. Germany, Mexico, Sweden and some other states challenged these reserves as incongruous with the really kernel of the Convention ( Connors, 1997 ) . In the 90s the Administration of Islamic States demonstrated a corporate resistance against international ordinances that imposed their Torahs on Muslim societies. Subsequently, the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam resolved that in the instance of certain contradictions, the Torahs of shari’a in respect to female rights should be preferred to international ordinances.

In this context, any favoritism of females in Muslim societies is lawfully justified, irrespective of international ordinances. Although every province is subjected to international Torahs ( An-Na’im, 1994 ) , the Muslims neglect these Torahs, making obstructions to the spread of human rights in their societies. Defending Islamic Torahs, Muslim governments utilise the commissariats of shari’a to warrant their actions. In this respect, the Muslims normally subdue militants, journalists and bookmans who make efforts to better the place of females in Muslim societies, even if they are guided by Islamic Torahs. Hamadeh ( 1997 ) explains this resistance as “the autocratic discourse of silence [ that consequences in the ] juridical monologue” ( p.346 ) . In the bulk of Muslim societies the commissariats of shari’a are inseparably connected with national and customary Torahs and are intertwined with Islamic cultural values. Despite the fact that sub-Saharan African states have accepted CEDAW without any reserves, they continue to keep patriarchal dealingss, and shari’a seems to back up these dealingss. Some Muslim societies in South India utilise bride firing as a signifier of domestic force. If a adult female fails to supply appropriate dowery to relations of her hubby, she may be killed. Although India Parliament issued the jurisprudence that prohibited bride combustion in 1983, the commissariats of shari’a defend those Moslems who utilise this pattern. In Nigeria domestic force is besides rooted in cultural values of Muslim societies and is maintained by shari’a ( Olawale, 1996 ) .

Some surveies conducted in the 80s – 90s demonstrate that in Muslim societies of Nigeria more than 30 per centum of females experience domestic force and this figure is invariably increasing ( Odujinrin, 1993 ) . Though the Nigerian fundamental law stipulates the equality between work forces and adult females, Nigerian governments have non introduced the Torahs that outlaw wife-beating, and attorneies in Nigeria seldom agree to work out the instances of domestic force. Overall, the Northern Nigerian Penal Code and the commissariats of shari’a strengthen the spread of domestic force, neglecting to see it as a offense. The legal credence of wife-beating in Nigeria is besides revealed through the absence of any societal services for female victims. Actually, regional authoritiess of certain Muslim societies ( particularly in Nigeria ) utilise their power to increase the importance of shari’a and diminish the function of international statute laws in respect to domestic force. The Egyptian fundamental law and other Torahs are based on the rules of gender equality, but in the 80s Islamic citizens of Egypt challenged these rules ; as a consequence, the fundamental law was changed, presenting the commissariats of shari’a as the footing of statute law. The legal justification of domestic force in Egypt is particularly obvious in the limited rights of females to disassociate. In peculiar, domestic force is non treated by Egyptian tribunals as the ground for divorce ( Tadross, 1998 ) . However, even if an Egyptian adult female succeeds to have a divorce, she may be either deprived of the detention over her kids or may be left without any agencies of subsistence. In any instance, divorce merely changes the topics of control, as after the divorce a adult female appears under the authorization of her male parent or other male relations.

In position of such fortunes, it is clear why Egyptian adult females conceal domestic force and avoid divorces. However, the grounds for such privacy are societal and cultural instead than legal, because most of Egyptian adult females acknowledge the right of work forces for whipping in the instances of noncompliance. Due to the deficiency of fiscal independency or instruction, females in Egypt tolerate domestic force. Harmonizing to the Egypt Demographic and Health Survey ( 1995 ) , one of three Egyptian females is beaten by their hubbies in different fortunes and places, including the province of gestation ( Seager, 1997 p.208 ) . On the footing of such probes, it is obvious that the commissariats of shari’a green goods conditions that intensify the spread of wife-beating in assorted Muslim societies. Using shari’a, Muslim governments set up the legal kingdom that deprives Muslim adult females of the possibility to get protection against violent actions of their hubbies. In 2004 Theo new wave Gogh, a celebrated Dutch histrion, movie manager and telecasting manufacturer was killed by a Muslim terrorist Mohammed Bouyeri for the movieSubmission, in which new wave Gogh depicted a low-level place of Muslim adult females and wife-beating in Islam. Produced from Hirshi Ali’s book,Submissionuncovers the being of domestic force in Muslim society through the representation of four females who are invariably beaten by their Muslim hubbies.

In the movie these adult females are portrayed in the kneeling place, telling the narratives of their lives and the inhuman treatment of their hubbies. The bare organic structures of these females covered merely with liquid head coverings demonstrate the Qur’anic poetries written in the Arabic linguistic communication. After the release ofSubmissionthe Muslims threatened Hirshi Ali and van Gogh. Actually, Theo new wave Gogh, the direct descendent of Vincent new wave Gogh’s brother, opposed all sorts of organized faith, uncovering his peculiar disdain to Islam. After the slaying of Theo new wave Gogh the state of affairs in the Netherlands was greatly aggravated ; assorted political figures, such as Geert Wilders, began to demand a five-year arrest to Muslim immigrants, but the Muslims oppose this political proposal. Hirshi Ali is traveling to do a subsequence ofSubmissionthat will picture societal and spiritual dictates in Muslim society through the vision of females ; several Muslim households in the Netherlands have initiated legal proceedings, trying to interdict the subsequence on the footing of the fact that it will supply a incorrect portraiture of Islam. But it is improbable that this claim will be satisfied, as the Dutch fundamental law allows freedom of look in the media.

Therefore, as the essay suggests, wife-beating in Muslim society is considered as a norm due to the inferior position of adult females. Islam provides work forces with the right to crush their married womans, if they are unable to get by with female noncompliance in other ways, and Muslim work forces utilise this right. Get downing from the tenet of Qur’an and the commissariats of Hadith that justify wife-beating, the spiritual, societal and legal dictates still exist in the modern universe, as is peculiarly shown in Theo new wave Gogh’s movieSubmissionor in Sasson’s workPrincess. With Muhammad’s blessing of wife-beating, Muslim work forces continue to use force against adult females presents, puting females in the inferior place ( Ahmed, 1992 ) . The efforts of Muslim clergy to lawfully warrant wife-beating and the subsidiary position of adult females aggravate the state of affairs even more than it was in the yesteryear, because the construct of wife-beating is intertwined with Islamic cultural values. Although the feminist motion attempts to better female place in assorted Muslim societies all over the universe ( Moghissi, 1999 ) , the resistance is excessively intense, influencing legal Torahs and wrongly construing the commissariats of the Qur’an and the Hadith. Such resistance demonstrates the Muslims’ reluctance to alter the bing societal system and accept international ordinances of human rights. In position of this resistance, it is obvious that Muslim governments utilise Islamic faith to extinguish any possibility of equality between work forces and adult females and warrant domestic force. Though some reforms for bettering female places have been created on the international footing, they collide with the commissariats of shari’a that are considered prior to other ordinances and Torahs.


Afkhami, M. & A ; Vazeri, H. ( 1996 )Claiming Our Rights: A Manual for Women’s Human Rights Education in Muslim Societies. Bethesda, MD, Sisterhood is Global Institute.

Ahmed, L. ( 1992 )Womans and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Argument. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.

Al-Qaradawi, Y. ( 1984 )The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam. Kuwait, International Islamic Federation of Student Organisation.

An-Na’im, A. A. ( 1994 ) State Responsibility under International Human Rights Law to Change Religious and Customary Laws.In: R. Cook ( ed. )Human Rights of Women: National and International Positions. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 167-188.

Asad, M. ( 1980 )The Message of the Qu’ran. Gibralter, Dar al-Andalus.

Bukhari, M. ( 1987 )Sahih Bukhari. Vols 7-8. New Delhi, India, Kitab Bhavan.

Bumiller, K. ( 1988 )The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Jimmy conorss, J. ( 1997 ) The Women’s Convention in the Muslim World.In: M. Yamani ( ed. )Feminism and Islam: Legal and Literary Positions. Ithaca, Ithaca Press. pp. 351-371.

Copelon, R. ( 1994 ) Intimate Panic: Understanding Domestic Violence as Torture.In: R. Cook ( ed. )Human Rights of Women: National and International Positions. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 116-152.

Dawood, N. J. ( 1995 )The Koran. London, Penguin.

Dobash, R. E. & A ; Dobash, R. P. ( 1980 )Violence Against Wives: A Case Study Against Patriarchy. London, Open Books.

El Alami, D. & A ; Hinchcliffe, D. ( 1996 )Islamic Marriage and Divorce Laws of the Arab World. The Hague, CIMEL and Kluwer Law International.

Guillaume, A. ( 1955 )The Life of Muhammad. London, Oxford University Press.

Halliday, F. & A ; Alavi, H. ( 1988 )State and Ideology in the Middle East and Pakistan. London, Macmillan.

Hamadeh, N. ( 1997 ) Islamic Family Legislation: The Authoritarian Discourse of Silence.In: M. Yamani ( ed. )Feminism and Islam: Legal and Literary Positions. Ithaca, Ithaca Press. pp. 331-351.

Hatimy, S. ( 1991 )Womans in Islam. Lahore, Pakistan, Islamic Publications.

Kathir, I. ( 2000 )Tafsir of Ibn Kathir. London, Al-Firdous Ltd.

Mackay, S. ( 1990 )The Saudis. New York, Signet.

Mayer, A. ( 1991 )Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politicss. Boulder, CO, Westview Press.

Mernissi, F. ( 1991 )The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam. Reading, MA, Perseus.

Moghissi, H. ( 1999 )Feminism and Islamic Fundamentalism: The Limits of Postmodern Analysis. London, Zed Books.

Muslim, A.-H. ( 1971 )Sahih Muslim. Riyadth, Saudi Arabia, International Islamic Publishing House.

Odujinrin, O. ( 1993 ) Wife Battering in Nigeria.International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetricss, 41, 159-164.

Olawale, A. ( 1996 )Womans and Violence in Kano, Nigeria. Ibadan, Spectrum Books Ltd. And IFRA.

Sasson, J. ( 1992 )Princess: A True Story of Life Behind the Veil in Saudi Arabia. Scranton, Pennsylvania, William Morrow and Co.

Seager, J. ( 1997 )The State of Women in the World Atlas. London, Penguin Books.

Stork, J. & A ; Beinin, J. ( 1997 )Political Muslimism. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Tadross, M. ( 1998 )Rightless Women, Heartless Men: Egyptian Women and Domestic Violence. Cairo, The Legal Research and Resource Center for Human Rights.

Under common law, no medical procedure can be<< >>Kato model analysis: Pfizer and Zoloft

About the author : admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.