To what extent is classroom management either
To what extent is classroom direction either a agency of restricting and commanding behavior or a agencies of stimulating and furthering acquisition?
Classroom Management: A Definition
Classroom Management as a Means of Restricting and Controlling Behaviour
Classroom Management as a Means of Stimulating and Fostering Learning
Children with Special Needs
In an ideal universe the reply to the rubric of this assignment would be simple and straightforward. In the best ( some would state notional ) instance scenario, schoolroom direction should ever be considered to be a agency of exciting and furthering acquisition over and above as a agency of restricting and commanding the students’ behavior. Indeed, this may one time hold been the instance when instructors were permitted to utilize force and physical subject so as to keep order in the schoolroom but now, at the morning of the 20 first century, this means of commanding behavior in the schoolroom is ( rather right ) deemed to be anachronic in add-on to detrimental to the well-being of the kids in inquiry. The sarcasm, of class, is that at the really minute when disciplinary steps have been diminished the behavior of many kids and immature people in secondary schools has descended to a province that is outside of the bounds of the norms for most grownups who would see going instructors. Therefore, with the societal worlds of the modern epoch – every bit good as the aforesaid restraints upon instructors when it comes to training pupils – comes the realization that there is in fact no simple and straightforward reply to the inquiry of what schoolroom direction precisely entails. The following survey purposes to offer merely such an history of the alone tests of modern twenty-four hours instruction.
For the intent of position, the essay will be split into two discernable parts. The first portion will look at the grounds for schoolroom direction being an art of commanding behavior while the 2nd will needfully analyze the grounds which suggests that schoolroom direction is still dictated chiefly by the demand and desire to further larning in secondary school kids. First, nevertheless, a definition of ‘classroom management’ must be asserted so as to set up a conceptual model for the balance of the treatment herein.
Classroom Management: A Definition
Classroom direction and instruction are non one in the same thing. Teaching trades merely with the pattern of confering information upon the kids in the teacher’s category ; non with pull offing all of the many factors that exist outside of the national course of study. Classroom direction requires an ability to blend the two accomplishments of learning the topics at manus every bit good as efficaciously pull offing these external jobs that arise in an ad hoc and wholly unpredictable mode. This is a cardinal difference between the two footings of ‘teaching’ and ‘classroom management’ and the definition of schoolroom direction given here should be borne in head throughout the balance of the treatment.
The two constructs besides differ when it comes to the issue of how best to fix would?be instructors for the challenges of schoolroom direction. Learning the accomplishment of instruction is non in itself a hard undertaking ( assuming that the pupil instructor in inquiry is in ownership of the needed intelligence and people accomplishments ) . The undertaking of fixing a novitiate instructor for the real properties and troubles in efficaciously pull offing a schoolroom, on the other manus, is a topic that can non merely be taught via text editions entirely. It has to be studied first manus, so as to appreciate the land to be travelled between theory and pattern when it comes to learning in the modern epoch. There are infinite illustrations of so?called ‘nightmare’ experiences of secondary school instructors with confusion and obfuscation at immature people’s behavior being the most common symptom of this funny cultural unease.
“Most of what goes on in some of our schools today is beyond the comprehension of most civilized people, particularly those older than, state, 30 five.” ( Chalk, 2006:45 )
The treatment herein is non, nevertheless, every bit straightforward as it may at first seem. Classroom direction, while implying a good trade of ad hoc administration of the human component of learning in a secondary school, is still dictated by the demand to instil cognition in the following coevals. In fact, if we take a serious adequate position of the function of the instructor in the modern twenty-four hours, we can state that it is indispensable that schoolroom direction does non lose sight of the raison d’etre of instruction, which is to supply British society with a skilled work force to maintain the national economic system clicking over in the coming decennaries. Therefore, the fast one is to try to strike a balance between these two opposing demands of schoolroom direction for the corporate good of UK civilization and society. With a definition of schoolroom direction holding been ascertained, attending must now be turned to the issue of schoolroom direction as a agency of commanding behavior.
Classroom Management as a Means of Restricting and Controlling Behaviour
“Schools trade with the whole spectrum of behavior: from kids who are absolutely behaved and extremely motivated, to those who bring really terrible behavior issues with them. There are assorted ways in which schools aim to pull off behaviour… The instructors will be taking to hold high outlooks and to put clear boundaries, to take positive attacks to utilizing wagess whenever possible, and besides using countenances when necessary.” ( Cowley, 2004:147-148 )
Child behavioral guru Sue Cowley points out the immense range of schoolroom direction for pupil instructors who wish to learn in a British secondary school. There are, in kernel, an about illimitable figure of fluctuations of the type of kids that the prospective instructor may hold to care for in the schoolroom, integrating physical and mental unwellnesss, psychological and behavioral jobs every bit good as a turning inclination to transport unsafe arms on school evidences. There is besides the ageless job of pull offing gender issues in the schoolroom with an on-going divide between the academic accomplishments of misss and male childs in province scrutinies looking to be testimony to the differing demands of males and females when it comes to basic educational demands. We should non, though, seek merely to indicate out the negative behavioral facets of the secondary school schoolroom. If this was the instance there would be an even smaller endowment pool of prospective instructors to take from nationally. It must be underscored that there are a good trade of good behaved pupils in schools throughout the state that will present few if any jobs for the instructor to hold to try to work out.
Much, of class, will depend upon external societal, economic and cultural factors that take topographic point outside of the bounds of the schoolroom in the children’s place life. This is non, nevertheless, to province that factors that take topographic point outside of the schoolroom do non come under the legal power of ‘classroom management’ . When a kid brings their cultural, societal or economic jobs into a school, the job at one time transforms itself from a private into a public concern that can hold a knock?on consequence upon the remainder of the schoolroom. This is an highly complex and debatable line of enquiry for the prospective instructor to follow where there can non realistically be any opportunity of a one hundred per cent success rate. Credence of the range of the job of pull offing immature people should accordingly ensue in a more realistic assessment of the issue of schoolroom direction as a agency of commanding the students’ behavior.
The above should simply be seen as a brief debut to the concerns prevalent in each and every secondary school schoolroom across the length and comprehensiveness of the state. Viewed through this prism, schoolroom direction can be understood as a microcosm of grownup concern direction, which is progressively fraught with internal discord and departmental divisions. Furthermore, one of the main concerns of modern twenty-four hours concern directors is besides one of the major jobs confronting instructors in secondary schools today: intimidation. Of all of the aspects of schoolroom direction as a agency of commanding behavior, intimidation is certainly the most urgent and is the concern that has the ability to bring down untold desolation upon schoolroom students. Indeed, the Department for Education has stated as much in its booklet on anti?bullying techniques for schools by underlining the nexus between controlled behavior and schoolroom direction.
“Good behavior and subject in schools are indispensable to successful instruction and learning.” ( Department For Education, 1994:1 )
The pattern of battling strong-arming decidedly comes within the bounds of ‘confining’ pupils’ behavior instead than ‘controlling’ pupils’ behavior. There is no realistic manner to command intimidation as the bulk of cases of maltreatment between immature people take topographic point outside of the schoolroom during interruptions in the school twenty-four hours. Confinement is a feasible option as the instructor is able to supervise state of affairss that occur within the schoolroom and can do the remainder of the teaching staff aware of possible jobs between certain pupils while at the same clip pull offing behavior in the schoolroom to an extent that it enables all of the kids to larn. As with the bulk of cases of commanding and restricting pupil behavior in the schoolroom, there is no right or incorrect manner to travel about pull offing intimidation as each instance will differ from the following and the so?called ‘tell tale- marks that strong-arming might be taking topographic point are non a entirely effectual design for halting physical and mental torment in school.
The issue of strong-arming is an utmost cause for concern for instructors who are acute on fabricating consent in the schoolroom, yet it would be incorrect to presume that it is merely terrible instances of misdirection such as this that stand as serious obstructions to the grasp of larning. Often, the causes of tenseness in the schoolroom can be of a much more everyday nature. In the concluding analysis, as Capel, Leask and Turner ( 1999:122 ) point out, instructors should seek non to bury that many kids would prefer to be in any other location than the schoolroom and that this is in itself a trigger for deep sitting behavioral jobs amongst pupils.
“The three most common causes of misbehavior in the schoolroom are boredom ; an inability to make the work a instructor has set ; and attempt demanded for excessively long a period without a interruption. Misbehaviour can besides be a agency of seeking attending. Clearly, these factors can be anticipated and avoided by careful lesson planning and considered category management.”
While emphasizing the demand for effectual and carefully planned schoolroom direction, the writers likewise acknowledge that this should non and frequently in pattern does non hold to take up a bulk of the teacher’s clip. The application of a set norm of regulations and imposts in the schoolroom, in add-on to the infliction of a discernable air of authorization, should be seen as the precursor to forestalling misbehavior in secondary school lessons. Ultimately, it is of import to chase away the myth that behavioral jobs ( particularly amongst adolescents ) are near to insurmountable. This is an incorrect and defeatist premise. With the right usage of consciousness, sensitiveness and common sense, about all schoolroom direction jobs can be efficaciously solved ( Smith and Laslett, 1993 ; Cowley, 2003 ) .
This is non to province that there are non certain occasions when restricting and commanding behavior will needfully hold to ensue in training a kid and it is this domain of schoolroom direction that has the greatest range to slop over into action outside of the schoolroom, moving as the accelerator behind the clang of the public and private domains of instruction.
“A major aim in censuring a student should be to avoid confrontation. The usage of private instead than public rebukes negates the demand for a student to salvage face in his or her societal domain. Avoid unjust comparings and ne’er abuse or knock a student ; instead, knock the behaviour.” ( Capel, Leask and Turner, 1999:126 )
If it is non handled in the right manner, training immature people can ensue – in the most utmost instances – in legal action being brought against the instructor in inquiry. The altering legal face of Britain at the start of the 20 first century should ne’er be forgotten ; neither should the impetus into a litigious society, which ( unluckily ) makes the subject of effectual schoolroom direction all the more combative and fraught with possible minefields. Surely, there can be no greater obstruction to the educational promotion of the remainder of the category than a disciplinary state of affairs with one student that manages to quite lawfully coiling out of control. Indeed, it is to the issue of furthering and exciting larning that attending must now be turned.
Classroom Management as a Means of Stimulating and Fostering Learning
“The pessimists in instruction argue that kids must be coerced into educational undertakings: that the regulation of fright and competition is the lone effectual arm for the school teacher to utilize. The progressive decline of the unquestioning credence of authorization in society at big is a powerful statement against this place, a decline achieved, in big portion, because of the fruits of instruction itself.” ( Walford, 2003:57 )
As the above citation attests, the old construct of coercing a kid into acquisition is disused in the modern epoch. Taking their cue from a society that has dispensed with inordinate authorization and that has panned to the caprices of a litigious civilization that has emanated from the United States immature people have become of all time more rebellious against authorization in recent old ages. Without the apparition of implemented subject and penalty, kids these yearss are much more likely to react to ‘heavy handed’ agencies of stimulating and furthering acquisition in a negative mode. Therefore, effectual schoolroom direction must look to the hereafter instead than the past in efforts at doing certain that learning in secondary schools is non reduced to a undertaking of pull offing one personal crisis after the other. Although the point has already been made, it is deserving underscoring once more that the raison d’etre of instruction is to fit the following coevals of determination shapers with the optimal educational and life accomplishments necessary to guarantee the go oning success of the UK as a successful independent state.
There are cardinal proficient differences between schoolroom direction as a agency of commanding behavior and schoolroom direction as a agency of furthering acquisition. The most obvious difference concerns the ad hoc, unplanned nature of restricting misbehavior in the schoolroom compared to the manner in which punctilious, good thought out planning of categories is able to greatly act upon the acquisition procedure in secondary schools. By taking clip to decode which manners of academic discourse best suit the pupils, schoolroom instructors are able to radically cut down the evidences for misbehavior every bit good as at the same time promoting the likeliness of cross spectrum larning. As with commanding behavior, there is no set right or incorrect manner to be after a secondary school lesson. Indeed, the lone certainty is that no two schoolrooms will be in understanding with respects to what constitutes a stimulating educational landscape or so a stimulating instructor, yet these divisions and diversenesss are to be expected. The thought that the whole of the schoolroom can at one time be silenced, stimulated and motivated to larn is a construct that exists entirely within the kingdom of phantasy.
When trying to instil a deep desire to larn in immature people, a common trap that teachers fall into is to concentrate merely on the demands of the less academically able kids at the disbursal of the more academically talented kids. While it is true that much attending needs to be paid to the less talented students, the deficiency of clip given to those immature people who wish to increase their rational capacity is a serious cause for concern. The issue is even more pertinent when it comes to effectual schoolroom direction of adolescents who are prone to let inattention to rapidly morph into apathy. Therefore, one of the greatest calamities of a province secondary school instruction is that of course gifted students who are eager to larn and get new accomplishments are all excessively frequently unmarked and – as a direct consequence – these same students over clip lose their enthusiasm for the schoolroom and, in many cases, end up remaining off wholly.
“The chief challenge for the secondary school topic instructor is to place the most able students in their categories and to utilize instruction schemes which challenge these students. This is portion of the general scheme ofdistinctionin the schoolroom. The footings ‘extension’ , ‘enrichment’ and ‘acceleration’ are valuable in be aftering for the most able.” ( Wellington, 2006:107 )
This transmutation from eager schoolroom participant to tire pupil can take topographic point in an extraordinarily short infinite of clip. Furthermore, due to the deficiency of communicating between adolescents ( particularly teenage male childs ) and school staff, what might look to be a simple instance of a taciturn student may good turn out ( in world ) to be a instance of a defeated pupil ( MacFarlane and McPherson, 1999:268-283 ) . As with much else with respects to the treatment at manus, there is a really all right and frequently unseeable line between success and failure and – one time once more – any prospective instructor would be foolish in the extreme if they were of the belief that they could educationally ‘save’ all of the bright kids all of the clip.
Traversing across the tightrope of the gifted and non so talented kids is mirrored in the broadening gender divide in the modern-day schoolroom that is manifested in year?on?year betterments in scrutiny consequences for misss and a similar tally of hapless consequences for male childs. The incrimination for this distressing tendency can non merely be laid at the door of society at big: instructors are responsible for the lame screening of immature males in an scrutiny type state of affairs.
“Every school has an equal chance policy. Teachers have a legal and moral duty to continue its rules. The purpose of equal chances is non equality in the sense of everybody accomplishing the same, i.e. equal accomplishment, which could ne’er be realised, but the remotion, every bit far as possible, of barriers or obstructions to educational accomplishment and success.” ( Wellington, 2006:95 )
Cultural, cultural, racial and spiritual differences will be discussed in a ulterior chapter but the issue of the ageless gender divide ought non to travel unnoticed. Pull offing it does non come under the rubric of ‘controlling pupil behaviour’ as the boundaries set are dependent on nature and familial endocrines entirely. This is a instance of furthering the desire to get new cognition in both of the sexes while still keeping due watchfulness with respects to single anomalousnesss. Before turning attending to extraordinary instances that the pupil instructor may or may non come across, reference must be made of the detonation in new digital engineering that has the possible to radically change the educational landscape for instructors in the close hereafter.
New engineering has furnished the modern instructor with a new arm in the conflict to further larning in the schoolroom. ICT methods of instruction, which embrace the most synergistic new media and telephone engineerings to add a whole new dimension to the cardinal ideals of what is to learn and what it means to larn, hold conspired to re?configure the possibilities for instructors endeavoring to keep order in the modern-day schoolroom. There has been a noticeable addition of larning via ICT in secondary schools in recent old ages with digital pictures, synergistic whiteboards and Internet networking all functioning to help the instructor in his or her quest to happen a safe center land between the two antonyms of trying to maintain harmoniousness in the schoolroom at the same clip as supervising go oning academic advancement. This development is, nevertheless, worthy of an essay in its ain right – the point here is that any sweeping decisions offered now that might concern the historical battlefield between, on the one manus, ‘the teacher’ and, on the other, ‘the students’ , would be wholly premature as new frontiers are presently being forged that will present another ‘third party’ to the equation: in this case, the debut of new engineering.
Children with Special Needs
“Progress in instruction for the following 20 five old ages has to get down with a acknowledgment of kids and immature people as they are. From this a context can be created which meets the full scope of pupil’s SEN’s… It is clear that effectivity can non be achieved without a committedness to supplying the necessary means.” ( Wedell, 1995:93 )
Of all of the many and varied domains of secondary school instruction in Britain, the issue refering kids with particular educational demands ( SEN’s ) is the 1 that is most likely to radically change in the extroverted old ages and decennaries. To understand the range for alteration inherent in the hereafter one demand do no more than to look into the past. Until every bit late as 1970 there was no authorities statute law that guaranteed mandatory instruction for kids with particular demands. This wide terminological umbrella of ‘special needs’ meant that many kids with disabilities that are today considered to be easy treatable ( such as Tourette’s Syndrome ) were denied a basic province instruction, which, when one thinks about it, is a discernibly Draconian province of personal businesss – non excessively far removed from the sole nature of Victorian schooling that decided which kids were to profit from the fruits of a formal instruction. However, despite this unfortunate start, the Thatcher Government oversaw some of the most wide?ranging alterations to province instruction in British history with a 1981 Act guaranting that kids with particular demands are guaranteed an instruction ‘as far as possible’ within their designated secondary schools. Subsequently, local instruction governments ( LEA’s ) have sought to increase the fiscal and logistical support available for instructors who have to integrate kids with particular demands in an already unstable and frequently overcrowded province secondary school system.
Yet pull offing a schoolroom with kids with particular demands is still clearly a hard state of affairs that requires a changeless monitoring of behavior in add-on to a strong will to guarantee that pupils’ SEN’s are translated into accomplishment at a recognized educational criterion. Together with cultural issues ( which will be dealt with in the undermentioned chapter ) , the particular demands quandary is one that will necessitate the most monitoring as the demands placed upon the secondary school instructor continue to inexorably lift. However, the new options raised by the debut of ICT learning in secondary schools do offer teachers a powerful assistance in their command to integrate kids with particular demands into the mainstream category.
“The usage of digital engineering liberates users with SEN from conventions imposed by more formal methods of written communicating. They can react at their ain gait and take part in societal interactions in a manner that is user-friendly and well-meaning. For kids who find reading and reacting to organic structure linguistic communication hard, nomadic phones and e-mailing can be positive ways to reach other people for advice or a friendly chat.” ( Dimitriadi and Peacey, 2005:119 )
The debut of new learning methods for kids with larning troubles is similarly facsimiled with respects to the widespread coming of multicultural diverseness in the modern schoolroom, to which attending must now be turned.
The pronounced rush in involvement in citizenship in province school schoolrooms is testimony to the residuary effects of multiculturalism on immature people in the United Kingdom. No longer being a instance of merely determining whether a student has come from England, Scotland, Northern Ireland or Wales, multiculturalism now entails a immense diverseness of kids who hail from alternate societal, spiritual, cultural and racial backgrounds, and even from different sexual parenthood. This is the drift behind the New Labour government’s thrust to integrate a state broad policy of ‘social inclusion’ , which it is hoped will assist to bridge many of the cultural divides at work in about every schoolroom in modern twenty-four hours Britain. Controling behavior and fosterage acquisition are both straight challenged by the being of multiculturalism ; so, the figure of possible jobs posed by multiculturalism is particularly huge. Language, for illustration, is a major job for many instructors who can non realistically handle students whose 2nd linguistic communication is English in the same scaling mode as they can handle those pupil’s for whom English is the lone linguistic communication that they know. To understand the gravitation of the job, one demand merely believe of the manner in which linguistic communication dictates the form of our grownup lives. When this dictatorial power of the written and spoken word is transferred to kids, the troubles confronting instructors become much more marked.
“Language is a system of sounds, significances and constructions with which we make sense of the universe around us. It functions as a tool of idea, as a agency of societal administration ; as a depository and agencies of transmittal of cognition ; as the natural stuff of literature ; and as the Godhead and upholder or destroyer of human relationships.” ( DES, 1989: paragraph 6.18 )
The graduated table of the job of linguistic communication barriers is certain to increase exponentially in the coming old ages as planetary boundary lines continue to be erased and transverse cultural out-migration continues apace. The new add-ons of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union on January 1st, 2007 will convey 1000s of Eastern European kids to British schools with small or no cognition of how to larn via the practical usage of English.
This is merely the most obvious job of big inflows of foreign kids into UK schoolrooms. Cultural issues clearly do non get down and stop with the issue of linguistic communication as a critical tool of human communicating. Differing codifications of frock, societal behavior, eating wonts and supplication rites ( to call but a few ) will surely impact upon the lesson programs of instructors, peculiarly those who teach in countries that are likely to be capable to big demographic alterations to their schoolroom, such as England’s South East. As with the debut of ICT in secondary schools, cultural diverseness in the schoolroom is a really recent phenomenon that can non be capable to a wide stretch decision at such an embryologic phase in its development. A decision as to whether schoolroom direction is a agency of commanding and restricting behavior as opposed to a agency of exciting and furthering acquisition, on the other manus, can and will be attempted.
To declare with any grade of certainty that schoolroom direction iseithera agency of commanding behaviorora agency of furthering acquisition is to wholly lose the point. Effective schoolroom direction requires an merger of the two in order to blend the successful finished article of the secondary school instructor. No instructor could be considered to be successful if he or she merely displayed one of the two indispensable qualities of being able to keep subject in the schoolroom every bit good as supplying immature people with the needed cognition to go through scrutinies and to be a productive member of society in their grownup old ages. Therefore, a balance has to be found whereby both qualities are easy exploited for the common good of the entireness of the schoolroom. This balance is what is known as ‘moral’ instruction whereby instructors instil a set of moral values in their students in add-on to keeping a rigorous attachment to the course of study and a alert oculus for cases of counterproductive, antisocial behavior forms.
“The values inherent in the purposes, contents, procedures and accomplishments of instruction are broad runing. They include opinions about human good implicit in general educational ideals and purposes ( for illustration, the ideal of personal liberty or of the ‘active citizen’ ) , peculiar opinions within topics or countries of survey ( such as the standards for a good verse form or an equal scientific account ) and committednesss of a societal and political sort ( seen, for illustration, in policies aimed at equality of chance in its assorted facets. ) ” ( McLaughlin, 2003:139 )
Ultimately, there can be no uncertainty that the cardinal rules of what constitutes a good instructor in the 20 first century appear unusually different to those same rules as applied merely a mere twenty old ages ago. Furthermore, the evident inevitableness of the victory of new engineerings in the schoolroom is likely to farther alter these rules in the extroverted old ages and decennaries. Therefore, in the concluding analysis, it is prudent to province the being of both the controlling and confining every bit good as the educationally inspirational facets of schoolroom direction while underscoring the demand to constantly recognize the potency for new partnerships that can be forged between pupils, instructors, parents and new larning methods.
Beck, J. and Earl, M. ( Eds. ) ( 2003 )Key Issues in Secondary Education: Second EditionLondon: Continuum
Capel, S. , Leask, M. and Turner, T. ( 1999 )Learning to Teach in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience: Second EditionLondon: Routledge
Chalk, F. ( 2006 )It’s your Time you’re WastingLondon: Monday Books
Cowley, S. ( 2003 )Geting the Small Buggers to ActLondon: Continuum
Cowley, S. ( 2004 )Geting your Small Darlings to ActLondon and New York: Continuum
Leask, M. and Pachler, N. ( Eds. ) ( 2006 )Learning to Teach utilizing ICT in the Secondary School: Second EditionLondon: Routledge
MacFarlane, A. and McPherson, A. ( 1999 ) ,Adolescents: the Agony, the Ecstasy and the AnswersLondon: Little, Brown and Co.
Moon, B. and Mayes, S. ( Eds. ) ( 1995 )Teaching and Learning in the Secondary SchoolLondon: Routledge
Smith, C.J. and Laslett, R. ( 1993 )Effective Classroom Management: A Teacher’s GuideLondon: Routledge
Wellington, J. ( 2006 )Secondary Education: The Key ConceptsLondon: Routledge
Dimitriadi, Y. and Peacey, N. ( 2006 )Particular Educational Needs and ICT, in, Leask, M. and Pachler, N. ( Eds. )Learning to Teach utilizing ICT in the Secondary School: Second EditionLondon: Routledge
McLaughlin, T.H. ( 2003 ) Valuess in Education, in, Beck, J. and Earl, M. ( Eds. )Key Issues in Secondary Education: Second EditionLondon: Continuum
Walford, R. ( 2003 )Classroom Teaching and Learning, in, Beck, J. and Earl, M. ( Eds. )Key Issues in Secondary Education: Second EditionLondon: Continuum
Wedell, K. ( 1995 )Particular Needs Education, in, Moon, B. and Mayes, S. ( Eds. )Teaching and Learning in the Secondary SchoolLondon: Routledge
Department of Education and Science ( 1989 )English for Ages 5-16London: HMSO
Department for Education ( 1994 )Bullying: Don’t Suffer in Silence. An Anti?Bullying Pack for SchoolsLondon: DFE