Theories of adolescence

Adolescence is the developmental phase between childhood and maturity ; “ The period of development from the oncoming of pubescence to the attainment of maturity. This begins with the visual aspect of secondary sexual features, normally between the ages of 11 and 13 old ages of age ( Colman 2006 ) . It represents the period of clip during which a individual experiences a assortment of biological alterations and involves a dramatic passages in the physical, societal, sexual, and rational domains. This essay will reexamine the theories of adolescences and the extent to which they characterise adolescences as a clip of storm and emphasis as suggested by Hall ( 1904 ) . First, the altering impression of adolescence through history and its cultural context will be discussed, followed by the biological, psychosocial and cognitive attacks to adolescence.

Adolescence as a period of emphasis and storm can be traced back every bit far as Hagiographas of Plato and Aristotle. Plato ( 1953 ) described adolescent male childs as invariably reasoning and really easy excited. Aristotle ( 1941 ) described striplings as “ missing in sexual temperateness, fickle in their desires, passionate and unprompted ” . However, during the in-between ages, adolescence was largely ignored as a life phase and kids were viewed as little grownups. “ Childhood and adolescence were regarded as two sides of the same coin ” ( Dubasa et al, 2003 ) . The first individual to find a difference between the two was Rousseau. Rousseau described it adolescence as “ A alteration in temper, frequent choler, a head in changeless agitation, makes the kid about unwieldy. His febrility turns him into a king of beasts. He disregards his usher ; he no longer wants to be governed. ” ( Rousseau, 1911 )

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!


order now

Psychologists of that clip agreed with Rousseau ‘s thoughts and in 1904, influenced by the evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin, G. Stanley Hall defined adolescence as a period of “ storm and emphasis, a clip of cosmopolitan and of inevitable turbulence ” . To Hall, adolescence represented a period when early human existences went from being beast-like to being civilized. To Hall, the terminal of the adolescent phase marked a new birth, in which higher, more wholly human traits were born. Culturally, in the eighteenth century, the period of adolescence was foremost seen in middle- and upper-class kids as instruction went on thirster and kids stayed place for an increasing part of their lives. By the twentieth century, after World War II, adolescence became a general phenomenon ( Dubasa et al, 2003 ) . Harmonizing to Koop et Al ( 2003 ) despite the historically altering position of adolescence and societal context in which they developed, these stereotypes of adolescences surely remain parallel to those of today and act as the foundation of our contemporary representations of adolescence.

The biological attack argues that the agitation in adolescence is cosmopolitan and is non effected by clip and societal context. Puberty is frequently considered to originate adolescence ( Petersen & A ; Taylor, 1980 ) . During pubescence, the immature individual achieves their grownup size and visual aspect aboard all the underlying physiological procedures ( Tanner, 1962 ) . Current grounds indicates that biological alterations make some part in regard to mood breaks. Susman et Al ( 1987 ) found that high degrees of assorted adrenal and gonadal androgens were linked with sad affect, cranky defiance and mild delinquent behavior in male childs. Extra grounds suggests that hormonal alterations during pubescence contribute to emotional volatility ( Buchanan et al. , 1992 ) and besides the negative tempers ( Brooks-Gunn et Al, 1994 ) seen in early adolescence. These surveies nevertheless, are limited as they focus on merely early adolescence and may be capable to reporter prejudice. They are based on the retrospective memory of temper and behavior as recalled by the female parents of the stripling. Puberty is besides thought to tag the completion of encephalon development ; the development of nervous tracts and the procedure of myelinization of nervus fibers incorporating the two hemispheres ( Yakolev & A ; Lecours, 1967 ) . Recent grounds nevertheless argues that alterations continue to happen in the encephalon over the whole life span ( Petersen, 1985 ) .

However, research has shown that the biological alterations of pubescence entirely do non do adolescent storm and emphasis either universal or inevitable. This can be demonstrated by the fact that non all civilizations experience adolescent storm and emphasis to the same grade and some civilizations do non see it at all. Margaret Mead ‘s survey ( 1928 ) found that adolescence in Samoa was a blissful, Utopian passage. These findings have been confirmed by legion other surveies looking at adolescence worldwide, describing that most traditional civilizations experience less storm and emphasis among their striplings, compared with the West ( Schlegel and Barry, 1991 ) . Thus the helter-skelter experience of striplings is non biologically determined but instead reflects the function of the cultural context in advancing these types of alterations. However, the cogency of Mead ‘s work has been questioned based on similar observations of the Samoan people by Freeman ( 1983 ) .

Harmonizing to Piaget ( 1950 ) , the alterations to the encephalon and it ‘s working during adolescence, the concluding phase of cognitive development, is thought to take topographic point during adolescence. Piaget described this development in footings of consecutive alterations in how kids think. Cognitive development during adolescence, known as the formal operational phase, involves a motion from concrete to abstract thought and a lessening in egoistic idea. Egoistic idea during this period leads to some peculiar behaviors such as fanciful audience ; the feeling of changeless examination, the personal fabrication ; sing one ‘s ideas and feelings as alone, self-consciousness and feelings of impregnability ; which can take to risk-taking behavior. This egoistic thought of early adolescence is diminishes by 16 due to shared experience with their equals. Once adolescents start to exert their new logical thinking accomplishments, they begin to reason for the interest of it, leap to decisions, and be overdramatic thought of lone themselves. These behaviors can take to the position that adolescence is a period of storm and emphasis. Research indicates that Piaget simplifies the developmental procedure by overrating the invariability of the order of phases. It has been argued that Piaget exaggerates the universalism of the phases and lacks ecological cogency as all his research was based on kids from knowing, high socio-economic backgrounds.

Freud ‘s theory of psychosexual development besides portrays adolescence as being fraught with internal battle. Harmonizing to Freud, during the last phase of psychosexual development, the “ venereal ” stage ; the kid is inundated with instinctual urges which disrupt the balance between the self-importance and Idaho. The self-importance is pulled between the urges of the Idaho and the limitations imposed by the superego. This struggle makes adolescence a clip of enormous emphasis and convulsion. Unfortunately the work of Freud is to a great extent criticised ; his work is based on a little figure of instance surveies and is hence regarded as undependable and can non be generalised to the whole population. This theory may hold been applicable at the clip it was developed but is non applicable today. Additionally, Freud ‘s theory has no empirical support as the concepts of the Idaho, self-importance and superego are subjective and can non be measured.

Based on Freud ‘s psychosexual construct of development, Erikson ‘s psychosocial theory ( 1968 ) takes a much wider position of the factors that impact development. Erikson proposed that accomplishing a sense of personal individuality is more of import than making sexual adulthood, he emphasised societal and cultural constituents of an stripling ‘s developmental experiences. Erikson described individuality as a sense of self-continuity. Like Freud, Erikson viewed adolescence as a clip of storm and emphasis and that the convulsion resulted from an individuality crisis ; a period during which the stripling is troubled by his deficiency of individuality. Erikson ‘s thoughts have been criticised as they were based on his observations of immature people undergoing therapy, hence non being genuinely representative of striplings. Research grounds suggests that the huge bulk of striplings do non see important psychological troubles. Offer ( 1969 ) concluded that Erikson ‘s construct of individuality crisis could non be general since most striplings ne’er experienced such a crisis ; this is supported by Douvan and Adelson ( 1966 ) . In their study of over three 1000 American striplings, chiefly aged 14-16 old ages old, they found merely a little per centum of striplings experience marks of restlessness, struggle, or instability. It is unsure nevertheless, if similar consequences would be found in other civilizations.

Marcia ‘s theory of individuality accomplishment ( 1980 ) contradicted the impression of adolescence as a clip of crisis. Marcia claims that adolescent individuality formation has two major parts: a crisis and a committedness. The injury in adolescence consequences from holding to do hard determinations about one ‘s individuality and traveling through the four different individuality positions: individuality diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium and eventually identity accomplishment. Milman ( 1979 ) provides some back uping grounds for Marcia ‘s theory. He found that a bulk of 12-15 twelvemonth old kids were in the individuality diffusion phase in comparing to the individuality accomplishment phase, nevertheless, he besides found that a big part of immature grownups have still non achieved the highest degree of individuality by their mid-20 ‘s, proposing that individuality formation may happen later than suggested by Marcia. There is besides grounds that suggests this hunt for individuality continues throughout the whole of the lifetime, with jumping periods of stableness and instability and motion back and Forth between phases ( Marcia, 1980 ) this suggests that maturity can affect merely every bit much convulsion as adolescence.

Supporting Marcia, the Strain Theory ( Agnew, 1997 ; Steffensmeier and Allan, 2000 ) , suggests that adolescence is non the period of “ storm and emphasis ” as described in earlier theories of development. It claims that striplings develop an increasing desire for grownup privileges, such as liberty, position and money. Adolescents are normally denied such privileges by grownups and are frequently treated with discourtesy. They are hence more likely to see these stressors as unjust and are more likely to see nonsubjective stressors than kids and grownups. Contemporary surveies have established that struggle with parents additions in early adolescence, compared with younger childhood, and typically remains high for a twosome of old ages before worsening in late adolescence ( Laursen et al, 1998 ) . Cross-cultural research ( Douvan & A ; Adelson, 1966 ; Offer, 1969 ) has shown that most striplings get along good with their parents and even follow their parents positions ( Adelson, 1979 ) . Furthermore, Kandel and Lesser ( 1972 ) found that striplings shared more positions with their parents than with their equals. Conversely, it has been suggested ( Steinberg, 1990 ) that conflict between striplings and their parents may really be good to the development of the stripling, as it promotes the development of individualism and liberty. High struggle may do adolescence a hard clip for striplings and their parents even if the struggle finally has benefits.

“ If striplings have to set to so much potentially nerve-racking alterations, and at the same clip base on balls through this phase of life with comparative stableness, as the empirical position indicates, how do they make it? ” ( Coleman and Hendry, 1999 ) .

The Focal theory ( Coleman and Hendry, 1999 ) suggests that striplings manage their issues by covering with merely one at a clip. Adolescents spread the procedure of accommodating over a figure of old ages, trying to decide merely one issue at a clip so the resulting emphasiss are seldom concentrated all at one clip. There is no grounds to propose that immature kids or old age pensionaries deal with issues in the same manner. This theory besides suggests that striplings play an active function and explains why some striplings cope whilst others fail to accommodate despite holding the same figure of crises. Unlike the traditional theories of adolescence, the Focal theory has the advantage of being based on empirical grounds. Despite this, get bying with one issue at a clip does non needfully bespeak stableness ( Coleman, 1978 ) . There is a demand for more grounds, peculiarly from longitudinal surveies, to prove Coleman ‘s claim.

The claim that adolescence is so a clip of storm and emphasis is based on many theories of stripling development. Each theory puts frontward a alone account for the footing of convulsion in adolescence, whether it is sexual, cognitive, or ensuing from societal challenges such as those based on surveies of striplings in intervention, which represents a little population of young person. Conversely, larger-scale surveies of development in adolescence that have focused on the ‘normal ‘ adolescent population have concluded that convulsion is comparatively uncommon ( Douvan and Adelson, 1966 ; Offer and Offer, 1975 ) . Montemayor ( 1983 ) concludes that although some struggle in adolescence is likely to be a normal portion of the transmutations that occur, it besides seems clear that there is small support for more utmost storm and emphasis impressions. Adolescents are merely traveling frontward to be like the group they are traveling to go: grownups. There are a comparatively few countries, such as offense, eating upsets and suicide do striplings set about behaviors more frequently than other age groups. However striplings are still by and large believed to be riotous or out of control.

Mentions

  • Adelson J. ( 1979 ) . Adolescence and the coevals spread. Psychology Today, 33ff.
  • Aristotle ( 1941 ) . Ethica nicomachea, W. D. Ross, Trans. In R. McKeon ( Ed. ) , The basic plant of Aristotle. New York: Random House.
  • Agnew R. ( 1997 ) . Stability and alteration in offense over the life class: A strain theory account. In T. P. Thornberry ( Ed. ) , Developmental theories of offense and delinquency ( pp. 101-132 ) . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Bronfenbrenner U. ( 1977 ) . Toward an experimental psychological science of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
  • Bronfenbrenner U. ( 1979 ) . The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Brooks-Gunn J, Graber JA, Paikoff RL. ( 1994 ) . Analyzing links between endocrines and negative affect: Models and steps. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 469-486.
  • Buchanan CM, Eccles J, Becker J. ( 1992 ) Are adolescents the victims of ramping endocrines? Evidence for activational effects of endocrines on tempers and behaviour at adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 62-107.
  • Coleman JC. ( 1978 ) . Current Contradictions in Adolescent Theory. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7, 1-11
  • Coleman J. and Hendry LB. ( 1999 ) The Nature of Adolescence, London: Routledge.
  • Douvan E, Adelson J. ( 1966 ) The adolescent experience. New York: Wiley.
  • Dubasa JS, Millerc K, Petersen AC. ( 2003 ) . The survey of adolescence during the twentieth century. History of the Family, 8, 375-397
  • Erikson EH. ( 1968 ) . Identity: Young person and crisis. New York: Norton.
  • Freeman D. ( 1983 ) . Margaret Mead and Samoa: The devising and unmaking of anthropological myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Freud A. ( 1958 ) . Adolescence. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 13, 255-278.
  • Freud A. ( 1968 ) . Adolescence. In A. E. Winter, & A ; D. Angus ( Eds. ) , Adolescence: Contemporary surveies ( pp. 13-24 ) . New York: American Book.
  • Hall G. S. ( 1904 ) . Adolescence: Its psychological science and its dealingss to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, offense, faith, and instruction, vols. 1 and 2. New York: Appleton.
  • Kandel DB, & A ; Lesser GS. ( 1972 ) . Youth in two universes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Koops W, Zuckerman M. ( 2003 ) Introduction: A historical developmental attack to adolescence. History of the Family, 8, 345-354
  • Laursen B, Coy KC, & A ; Collins WA. ( 1998 ) . Reconsidering alterations in parent-child struggle across adolescence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 69, 817-832.
  • Marcia JE. ( 1980 ) Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson ( Ed. ) , Handbook of adolescent psychological science ( pp.159-187 ) . New York: Wiley.
  • Mead M. ( 1928 ) . Coming of age in Samoa. New York: New American Library.
  • Milman DH. ( 1979 ) . Minimal encephalon disfunction in childhood. Outcome in late adolescence and early grownup old ages. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 40, 371-380.
  • Montemayor R. ( 1983 ) . Parents and striplings in struggle: All households some of the clip and some households most of the clip. J. Early Adoles. 3: 83-103.
  • Offer D. ( 1969 ) . The psychological universe of the adolescent. New York: Basic Books.
  • Offer D, & A ; Offer J. ( 1975 ) . From teenage to immature manhood: A psychological survey. New York: Basic Books.
  • Petersen AC. ( 1985 ) . Pubertal development as a cause of perturbation: Myths, worlds, and unreciprocated inquiries. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 111, 205-232.
  • Petersen AC, Taylor B. ( 1980 ) . The biological attack to adolescence: Biological alteration and psychological version. In J. Adelson ( Ed. ) , Handbook of adolescent psychological science ( pp. 117-155 ) . New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Piaget, J. ( 1950 ) . The psychological science of intelligence. London: Routledge & A ; Kegan Paul.
  • Plato. ( 1953, 4th Ed. ) . Laws. ( B. Jewett, trans. ) The duologues of Plato ( Vol. 4 ) . New York: Oxford University Press ( Clarendon Press ) .
  • Rousseau JJ. ( 1763 ) . Emile on instruction. London: Nourse & A ; Vaillant ( originally Emile ou de l’Education, 1762 ) .
  • Savin-Williams RC, & A ; Berndt TJ. ( 1990 ) . Friendship and equal dealingss. In S. S. Feldman, & A ; G. R. Elliott ( Eds. ) , At the threshold: The developing stripling ( pp. 277-307 ) . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • Schlegel A, & A ; Barry H, III. ( 1991 ) . Adolescence: An anthropological enquiry. New York: Free Press.
  • Steffensmeier D, & A ; Allan EA. ( 2000 ) . Looking for forms: Gender, age, and offense. In J. Sheley ( Ed. ) , Criminology ( pp. 85-127 ) . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Steinberg L. ( 1985 ) . Adolescence. Knopf, New York.
  • Susman EJ, Inoff-Germain G, Nottelmann ED, Loriaux DL, Cutler GB, Chrousos GP. ( 1987 ) Hormones, emotional temperament and aggressive properties in immature striplings. Child Development, 58, 1114 – 1134
  • Tanner JM. ( 1962 ) . Growth at adolescence. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Yakolev PI, Lecours AR. ( 1967 ) . The myelogenetic rhythms of regional ripening in the encephalon. In A. Minkowski ( Ed. ) , Regional development of the encephalon in early life ( pp.3-70 ) . Oxford: Blackwell
To what extent were the policies of the Leninist<< >>Discuss the nature and the reasons for the opposition

About the author : admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.